Save Claude Code Tokens with Smart Routing

---

🧩 When can I use Brick?

Brick is for anyone running against more than one model, or paying flat rate for a single strong one. Three common cases:

1. You have a pool of models and want each query to reach the right one. Cheap prompts should not burn your most expensive model, and hard prompts should not be starved on a small one. Brick reads capability and complexity per query and dispatches accordingly, so the pool works as one graded system instead of a manual pick.

2. You want to cut Claude Code / Codex costs without losing quality. Put Brick in front of your coding agent and every request is routed to the cheapest model that can actually do the job, escalating only when the task needs it. You keep the same UX and pay for the hard turns, not the easy ones.

3. You want to unify different models behind one tool. Use OpenAI models, GLM, DeepSeek, Kimi, Qwen and others from inside Claude Code or Codex through a single OpenAI-compatible endpoint. Define the pool once in config.yaml and call model: "brick" everywhere.

---

⚡ Quickstart

The fastest working path today is the CLI, which self-hosts the router and wires it into Claude Code for you. Requires Node >= 18 and Docker.

git clone https://github.com/regolo-ai/brick-SR1.git
cd brick-SR1/apps/cli && npm install && npm run build && npm link

brick claude on     # starts the router + wires ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL in ~/.claude/settings.json

Then open a new Claude Code session and pick brick-claude in the /model picker. Every request now routes to haiku / sonnet / opus by capability and complexity. See Brick + Claude Code for modes, the effort picker, and the live brick claude status dashboard.

Prefer a raw OpenAI-compatible gateway (no CLI)?

Once the Docker image is published (see Distribution channels), you'll be able to run the gateway directly:

docker run --rm -p 18000:18000 \
  -e REGOLO_API_KEY=$REGOLO_API_KEY \
  ghcr.io/regolo-ai/brick:latest      # published at the next v2.1.0 tag

Then call it like any OpenAI endpoint, just set "model": "brick":

curl http://localhost:18000/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $REGOLO_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"model":"brick","messages":[{"role":"user","content":"Prove that sqrt(2) is irrational"}]}'

The x-selected-model response header tells you which backend Brick picked. That math prompt routes to a reasoning model; "Hello" routes to the cheapest one.

Until then, brick serve (from the CLI above) runs the same router locally from source.

---

🤔 Why Brick

	Single model	RouteLLM	FrugalGPT / Cascade	Brick
One call per query (no cascade waste)	✅	✅	❌	✅
Capability-aware (6 dimensions)	n/a	❌ binary	❌	✅
Complexity-aware	n/a	partial	✅	✅
Pool of N open + closed models	n/a	2	few	✅
Continuous cost ↔ quality knob	❌	❌	threshold	✅ r ∈ [-1, 1]
Native multimodal (image / audio)	varies	❌	❌	✅
Drop-in OpenAI-compatible	n/a	n/a	n/a	✅

Cascade routers (FrugalGPT, Cascade Routing) call models one after another until a confidence check passes, paying for every miss in tokens and latency. Brick makes a single forward decision per query, so there is nothing to waste.

---

🧠 Brick + Claude Code

gosmiulator.mp4

Put one OpenAI/Anthropic-compatible endpoint in front of Claude Code, and Brick routes every request to haiku, sonnet, or opus based on capability and complexity. You keep the Claude Code UX; Brick picks the cheapest model that can do the job.

Setup

brick claude on     # wires ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL in ~/.claude/settings.json, auto-starts the router

Then:

1. Open a new Claude Code session (your current session is unaffected).

2. In the /model picker, select brick-claude (it sits alongside the built-in opus/sonnet/haiku aliases, which it does not replace).

To revert:

brick claude off    # restores ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL, optionally stops the router

Use brick claude on --no-start to require an already-healthy router instead of auto-starting one, and brick claude off --stop / --keep to control the router without a prompt.

The 5 modes: pick your cost/quality trade-off

A mode is how you tell Brick how much to spend. Each one maps easy/medium/hard queries to a model tier, from cheapest (eco, always haiku) to strongest (max, always opus), with lite, mid and pro in between. Pick one and Brick handles the per-query routing inside it.

2026-07-03.23-55-05.mp4

You switch mode straight from the thinking effort slider in Claude Code's /model picker: low picks eco, medium lite, high mid, xhigh pro, and max max. So the effort control does not set a thinking budget, it selects the model tier. You can also switch explicitly with brick claude mode or brick claude <mode>.

mid is the default. On 1M-context requests the map shifts up since Haiku has no 1M variant: easy and medium resolve to sonnet, hard to opus.

Once you have picked the tier, how hard to think is decided autonomously per request from the router's own signals (query difficulty plus the chosen model's headroom).

Native models bypass the router

Selecting opus, sonnet, or haiku explicitly in the picker skips Brick entirely: the request is forwarded verbatim to that exact model, with no skill routing and no effort override. Only brick-claude runs the router.

Observability

brick claude status         # live dashboard (default in an interactive terminal)
brick claude status --once  # static one-shot view

The dashboard reports, since the last router restart:

• Routed by model: count and percent per model.

• Per-model effort distribution: how reasoning effort spread out within each model.

• Difficulty mix: the classifier's easy/medium/hard verdicts across routed requests.

• Economy: an estimated saved ~X% vs all-opus over the routed request count (a relative estimate from request mix, excluding real token counts and caching).

It also shows connection/wiring state, classifier latency (avg, p50, p95), and fallback rate.

Works with workflows and subagents

Brick routing is per request. In Claude Code workflows and subagents, each agent's call is routed independently as long as that agent uses brick-claude, so a cheap subagent task can land on haiku while a hard one escalates to opus in the same run.

---

🤖 Use it on Codex

The same idea behind OpenAI Codex: Brick sits in front of Codex and routes each request across your model pool, so you cut cost on easy turns and can drive Codex with non-OpenAI models through one OpenAI-compatible endpoint.

Setup

brick codex on      # sets model/model_provider to brick in ~/.codex/config.toml, auto-starts the router

This materializes a dedicated Codex profile (the OpenAI-pool skill router) and adds a managed provider pointing at the local router. Start a new Codex session and it now routes through Brick.

To revert:

brick codex off     # restores your previous Codex model/provider

Codex exposes the same 5 modes and status view as Claude Code:

brick codex mode           # or: brick codex eco | lite | mid | pro | max
brick codex status         # live routing dashboard

Use brick codex on --no-start to require an already-healthy router instead of auto-starting one. The Claude and Codex router stacks share host port 8000, so only one can serve at a time; stop the other before wiring.

---

🔌 Use Brick on its own

You do not need a coding agent. Brick is a plain OpenAI-compatible gateway you can call from any client, script, or app.

brick serve                       # docker compose up on http://localhost:18000
brick chat                        # TUI chat against the local router
brick route "what is 2+2?"        # print the routing decision for a prompt, no call made

Call it like any OpenAI endpoint, just set "model": "brick":

curl http://localhost:18000/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $REGOLO_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"model":"brick","messages":[{"role":"user","content":"Prove that sqrt(2) is irrational"}]}'

The x-selected-model response header tells you which backend Brick picked. That math prompt routes to a reasoning model; "Hello" routes to the cheapest one.

Configure the pool in config.yaml

Everything Brick decides comes from config.yaml. The core block is skill_router, where you declare the pool, each model's skill vector, and its cost weight:

skill_router:
  enabled: true
  capabilities:                 # the 6 dimensions every query and model live in
    - coding
    - creative_synthesis
    - instruction_following
    - math_reasoning
    - planning_agentic
    - world_knowledge

  models:
    - model: "qwen3.5-9b"
      skill_vector: [0.71, 0.51, 0.81, 0.91, 0.58, 0.18]   # capability per dimension
      use_reasoning: false
      cost_weight: 0.10                                     # relative price, drives the cost bias
    - model: "deepseek-v4-flash"
      skill_vector: [0.82, 0.66, 0.86, 0.93, 0.62, 0.49]
      use_reasoning: false
      cost_weight: 0.40
    - model: "kimi2.6"
      skill_vector: [0.90, 0.75, 0.87, 0.94, 0.64, 0.34]
      use_reasoning: true
      reasoning_effort: "medium"
      cost_weight: 0.60

Add or swap any OpenAI-compatible backend here; the backends themselves are declared under provider_profiles / model_config (the shipped config points them all at Regolo). Two more blocks let you nudge routing without touching the math:

  keyword_rules:
    - name: "force_coder"       # hard override: send these prompts to a specific model
      mode: "override"
      model: "kimi2.6"
      operator: "OR"
      keywords: ["debug", "refactor", "compile", "write a function"]
    - name: "coding_bias"       # soft nudge: push one capability dimension up
      mode: "bias"
      capability: "coding"
      operator: "OR"
      keywords: ["python", "rust", "sql", "async"]

Other useful sections: brick (multimodal preprocessing: STT, OCR, vision), the r preference knob in r ∈ [-1, 1] (max-saving to max-quality), and the classifier endpoints. The CLI can edit most of this for you (brick add model, brick config edit), or edit the YAML directly. Full field reference: apps/router/README.md.

---

🗂️ What's in the repo

A monorepo to run, use, and reproduce every result in the Brick paper.

Component	Path	Purpose
Router (Go + Rust)	apps/router/	OpenAI-format gateway: capability + complexity classifiers, dispatch to the best backend
CLI (brick)	apps/cli/	TypeScript/oclif companion to self-host in one command
Training	packages/training/	ModernBERT capability sweep + complexity LoRA recipes
Evaluation	packages/evals/	Dataset A pipeline + 3-judge majority-vote panel
Baselines	packages/evals/baselines/	Zero-shot RouteLLM, FrugalGPT, Cascade comparisons
Paper	docs/paper/	LaTeX source, figures, compiled PDF

Full directory tree

brick-SR1/
├── apps/
│   ├── router/                 # Go + Rust gateway (was vLLM Spatial Router fork)
│   │   ├── src/spatial-router/ #   Go (HTTP proxy, routing pipeline)
│   │   ├── candle-binding/     #   Rust (ML embeddings via candle)
│   │   ├── ml-binding/         #   Rust (Linfa classical ML)
│   │   ├── nlp-binding/        #   Rust (BM25 + n-gram)
│   │   └── Dockerfile
│   └── cli/                    # @regolo-ai/brick CLI (TypeScript + oclif + ink)
├── packages/
│   ├── training/               # Dataset B pipeline + ModernBERT/complexity training
│   ├── evals/                  # Dataset A graders + 00..140 pipeline + baselines/
│   └── datasets/               # HF download recipes (no data in git)
├── docs/
│   ├── paper/                  # paper.tex + figures + compiled PDF
│   └── quickstart/             # quick.md, serve.md, eval.md
├── deploy/                     # docker-compose, addons, Windows installer
├── config.yaml                 # router runtime config
├── package.json / pyproject.toml  # npm + uv workspace roots
└── Makefile                    # build / test / lint / docker-build / release

---

🛠️ Develop

make install   # npm install (apps/cli) + uv sync (packages/*)
make build     # CLI + router Docker image
make test      # Go tests + Python pytest + CLI vitest
make lint      # pre-commit run --all-files

Per-component docs: router · CLI · training · evals · datasets · baselines.

Distribution channels (work in progress)

Channel	Status
Source clone + npm link	available
Docker GHCR (ghcr.io/regolo-ai/brick)	pending first push (tag v2.1.0)
npm (@regolo-ai/brick)	pending NPM_TOKEN secret
Docker Hub mirror (docker.io/regolo/brick)	pending Docker Hub secrets

---

❓ FAQ

How is Brick different from a cascade router like FrugalGPT?

A cascade calls models in sequence (cheap first, escalate on low confidence) and pays for every miss in tokens and latency. Brick makes a single forward decision per query from a capability vector and a complexity score, so there is no wasted call. See Why Brick.

Which backend did Brick pick for my request?

Read the x-selected-model response header. Every /v1/chat/completions and /v1/messages response carries it.

How do I trade cost against quality?

Slide the r knob in r ∈ [-1, 1]. At r = -1 Brick favors the cheapest capable model (max-saving), at r = 1 it favors the strongest (max-quality). For Claude Code the same idea is exposed as 5 named modes, see the 5 modes.

Do I need GPUs to run the gateway?

No. The router and both classifiers run on CPU. GPUs only matter if you self-host the backend LLMs; with a hosted pool (Regolo, Anthropic, etc.) a CPU box is enough.

Can I use my own model pool?

Yes. The pool, per-model skill vectors, costs, and the model_map live in config.yaml (skill_router.models). Add or swap any OpenAI-compatible backend. See apps/router/README.md.

What is the upstream for the OpenAI-compatible endpoint failing with 401/insufficient_quota?

That error comes from the backend provider, not Brick. Check the credential you forward (REGOLO_API_KEY or your own key); Brick passes Authorization through unchanged.

---

🤝 Contributing

Contributions are welcome. The short loop:

make install   # deps for CLI + Python workspaces
make test      # Go + pytest + vitest, run before opening a PR
make lint      # pre-commit run --all-files

1. Open an issue to discuss non-trivial changes first.

2. Branch from main, keep commits focused, follow the existing style of the files you touch.

3. Make sure make test and make lint pass.

4. Open a PR with a clear description of the what and the why.

For architecture and per-component conventions, start from What's in the repo and the component READMEs linked under Develop.

---

🔬 Paper & experiments

Everything below reproduces the research behind Brick: the benchmark numbers, the routing algorithm, the datasets and models, and the paper itself.

📊 Results (Dataset A, n=5,504)

Brick sits on the Pareto frontier of cost vs quality, dominating single-model baselines and prior routers (RouteLLM, FrugalGPT, Cascade Routing) and approaching the oracle ceiling.

Setting	Accuracy	Cost (× cheapest)	Latency (avg)
Always Qwen3.5-9b	65.4%	1.0×	8.1 s
Always DeepSeek-v4-flash	71.2%	4.0×	14.7 s
Always Kimi2.6	75.02%	6.0×	51.2 s
Brick (max-quality)	76.98%	1.5×	22.8 s
Brick (max-saving)	72.4%	1.0×	9.4 s
Oracle bound (3-model pool)	83.25%	n/a	n/a

Brick beats always-Kimi at ~4× lower cost and roughly half the latency. Inter-rater agreement on the 3-judge eval panel: κ = 0.761. Full per-dimension breakdown and baseline reproduction in packages/evals/baselines/RESULTS.md.

🧠 How it works

For every request the router computes a capability vector and a complexity score, then picks the model whose skill profile is closest to what the query needs.

flowchart LR
  Q([Query]) --> C[Capability classifier<br/>ModernBERT → p&#40;x&#41; ∈ Δ⁶]
  Q --> X[Complexity classifier<br/>Qwen3.5-0.8B + LoRA → τ]
  C --> R{{Skill-distance argmin<br/>Jₘ = Dₘ + β·aₘ}}
  X --> R
  R --> M1[qwen3.5-9b]
  R --> M2[deepseek-v4-flash]
  R --> M3[kimi2.6]

Loading

The query and each model live as vectors in the same capability space. The winner is the model whose skill vector is nearest to the query's needs, biased by a cost term:

1. Capability p(x) ∈ Δ⁶: soft assignment over coding, creative_synthesis, instruction_following, math_reasoning, planning_agentic, world_knowledge (brick-modernbert-capability-classifier).

2. Complexity τ ∈ {easy, medium, hard} (brick-complexity-2-eco, Qwen3.5-0.8B + LoRA).

3. Objective per model: Jₘ = Dₘ + β·aₘ, distance Dₘ = ‖p(x) − sₘ‖ plus normalized cost aₘ.

4. Argmin over the pool → selected backend. The r knob slides the whole pool from max-saving to max-quality.

Multimodal inputs are preprocessed (OCR, Whisper-compatible STT) then routed as text, or forwarded directly to a vision model. Details in apps/router/README.md and the paper §3.

🔁 Reproduce the paper

Full evaluation pipeline (Dataset A, 5,504 queries)

git clone https://github.com/regolo-ai/brick-SR1 && cd brick-SR1

uv sync                                                  # Python workspaces
cd apps/cli && npm install && cd ../..                   # CLI

# Download HF artifacts (datasets + models)
python packages/datasets/scripts/download_dataset_a.py --out ./data/dataset_a
python packages/datasets/scripts/download_models.py     --out ./models

# Inference + grading
python packages/evals/scripts/100_run_inference.py  --config packages/evals/configs/protocols.yaml
python packages/evals/scripts/110_grade_inference.py
python packages/evals/scripts/130_aggregate_results.py | tee results.txt

# Expected: Brick max-quality ≈ 76.98% accuracy, oracle bound ≈ 83.25%

Full pipeline (judges, baselines, cost/Pareto analysis): docs/quickstart/eval.md.

🤗 Datasets & models

Artifact	HF Repo	Type	Notes
Dataset A (eval)	regolo/brick-dataset-A-routing-eval	dataset	5,504 queries, 6 dims, per-model verdicts
Dataset B (training)	massaindustries/dataset-B-modernbert-train	dataset	~50k labeled, multi-label
Capability classifier	regolo/brick-modernbert-capability-classifier	model	ModernBERT-base, 6-label sigmoid
Complexity classifier	regolo/brick-complexity-2-eco	model	Qwen3.5-0.8B + LoRA, 3-class

Download recipes: packages/datasets/.

📄 Paper

Brick and the Mixture-of-Models (MoM) Paradigm: Bridging Open- and Closed-Weight LLM Pools Francesco Massa, Marco Cristofanilli (2026) · Built at Regolo.ai (Seeweb)

Pre-built PDF: docs/paper/paper.pdf · compile with cd docs/paper && latexmk -pdf paper.tex.

@misc{massa2026brick,
  title  = {Brick and the Mixture-of-Models ({MoM}) Paradigm:
            Bridging Open- and Closed-Weight {LLM} Pools},
  author = {Massa, Francesco and Cristofanilli, Marco},
  year   = {2026},
  url    = {https://github.com/regolo-ai/brick-SR1}
}

📈 Star history