← 返回日报
精读 预计 3 分钟

Are readers generating fiction with AI models?

摘要

论文基于 arXiv:2405.01470 数据集,统计显示超过三分之一对话涉及虚构创作,包括原创故事、角色扮演、粉丝故事和情色内容;这些内容主要由权力用户主导;作者识别出常见模式,如 "无限故事需求者"(反复要求和修改同类或相似叙事);用户偏好粉丝故事和情色,倾向于通用形式、重复、即时性和特定元素组合;这一现象引发两点理论探讨:AI 可能形成 "solipsistic reader-writer"(封闭对话循环,用户与机器而非人类互动),以及 LLMs 赋予的互动、游戏和排列特性对故事和娱乐生态的影响;并置于自出版、粉丝文化和色情等领域,指出 AI 生成虚构与按需、个性化、重复的文化形式存在结构亲和性。

荐读理由

AI 用户里超1/3都在生成原创故事、角色扮演、粉丝向和情色内容,主导者是重度用户,他们反复索要、修改同一或类似叙事,形成‘无限故事需求者’;这暴露了LLM能无尽迭代的交互性,可直接搬到你AI工程项目里做个性化叙事生成系统

原文

Computer Science > Computation and Language

[Submitted on 22 Jun 2026 (v1), last revised 23 Jun 2026 (this version, v2)]

Title:AI Fiction in the Wild

Authors:Neel Gupta, Maria Antoniak, Melanie Walsh

View a PDF of the paper titled AI Fiction in the Wild, by Neel Gupta and 2 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Some professional authors are beginning to use AI tools to help produce their fiction writing. Are readers using AI to generate fiction, too? Drawing on over 500,000 anonymized, English-language ChatGPT-user conversations (arXiv:2405.01470), we find that more than one third of the conversations involve some form of fiction generation -- including original stories, roleplay, fanfiction, and erotica. This AI-generated fiction is notably dominated by power users. We identify common fiction generation patterns and profiles among these users, including what we call "infinite story demanders," who repeatedly request and revise variations of the same or similar narratives over extended periods of time. We show that users especially gravitate toward fanfiction and erotica, and that they are broadly drawn to generic forms, repetition, immediacy, and niche combinations of story elements. Our findings motivate two theoretical provocations. First, we argue that AI technologies may lead to a shift in the conventional relationship between the author and reader, potentially producing what we call a "solipsistic reader-writer," who both generates and consumes fiction within a closed conversational loop, interacting with a machine rather than a human other. Second, we note that LLMs enable interactivity, play, and permutation in ways that are seemingly pleasurable for users, raising questions about where AI will fit into contemporary storytelling and entertainment ecosystems. We situate these developments within broader transformations in literature and media, including self-publishing, fanfiction, and pornography, and suggest that AI-generated fiction shares structural affinities with on-demand, personalized, and repetitive cultural forms.

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.22748

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Comments:
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY)
Cite as: arXiv:2606.22748 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2606.22748v2 [cs.CL] for this version)

Submission history

From: Melanie Walsh [view email] [v1] Mon, 22 Jun 2026 01:29:16 UTC (10,176 KB) [v2] Tue, 23 Jun 2026 04:29:22 UTC (10,176 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

license icon view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

< prev | next >

new | recent | 2026-06

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI cs.CY

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

  • Author

  • Venue

  • Institution

  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Hacker News · 8 赞 · 10 评 讨论 → 阅读原文 →

这条对你有帮助吗?